Fake News versus Fake Prosecutions
For those of you who like the First Amendment, here is some good news. For those of you who do not like the first Amendment, you are on the the wrong website; please go home and crawl under your rocks (bunkers, yachts, spacecraft, etc.)
The Stalinesque J20 Trial is now underway in the Capitol of our Capitalistic society. J20 refers to the date of the Orangutan's inauguration as world's most powerful ape. 33 minutes of mayhem and property destruction accompanied an otherwise peaceful protest of citizens against LOTE Trump's elevation to to the throne.
With the characteristic finesse of the Washington Metro police dept, heavily aided by all sorts of government operatives armed with body cams, 184 people attending the inauguration were penned up like cattle when they tried to leave the scene. The "kettling" was simple: arrest the first bunch of folks walking away from the demonstration, whether or not they had anything to do with the property damage. So, while genuine property destroying elements may have been corralled, most of the unfortunates so encumbered were journalists, medial aid personnel or simply innocent observers.
The laundry list of charges was an example of legal "piling on" (which, if this were the NFL, would have gained a substantial penalty).
The government (aka MAGAcytes) attempted to squelch this demonstration of protest, primarily peaceful, by just grabbing the first observers trying to leave the scene. Yes damage was done to physical property. But were those corralled and arrested necessarily guilty? Body cam and observers testimony could not determine that any of the initial 6 defendants were guilty of anything except being at the wrong place at the wrong time.
Not Guilty verdicts were rendered to the first 6 of 184 tried.
All six defendants in a crucial trial involving demonstrators arrested during President Donald Trump’s inauguration were found not guilty of all charges on Thursday.
The trial of the six defendants ― Jennifer Armento, Oliver Harris, Brittne Lawson, Michelle Macchio, Christina Simmons and Alexei Wood ― began in mid-November. It raised major First Amendment issues and was seen as a bellwether that could determine whether the government will proceed with the prosecutions of many of the nearly 200 other defendants who have trials scheduled throughout the next year.
Justice Department prosecutors representing the U.S. government conceded at the beginning of the trial that there was no evidence any of the six defendants engaged in any property destruction or violence on Jan. 20. But they alleged the defendants were part of a rioting conspiracy
But, fuck it all, let's try them anyway. And that's what the DOJ, under the direction of J. Beauregard Sessions is going to do. Yes, pounce on innocent (for the most part) plebes rather than Killary Klinton and her emailing friends who actually did compromise national security.
Fake news? Yes, there is plenty of that, going back decades. Only recently has the woke public been aware of that. Fake prosecutions? We have an administration that proudly adopts the tactics of Josef Stalin and Adolph Hitler or trying anyone trying to stand up to him (with the notable exception of HRC).
Please remember that the arresting agency is none other than the DC Metro Police which has done such an excellent investigation of Seth Rich's murder. Prejudice here? Say what?
Attorneys also suggested the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia is only pursuing the case to protect the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, which appears to have violated D.C. regulations laying out how law enforcement is supposed to handle demonstrations in the nation’s capital. Video showed officers shooting pepper spray with abandon and using questionable force against individuals who didn’t appear to pose any threat....
Defense attorneys also zeroed in on the biases of Metropolitan Police Department Detective Gregg Pemberton, who has been investigating the inauguration unrest every working day since Jan. 20. Pemberton had sent anti-activist tweets and written disparagingly about Black Lives Matter.
Damage Control anyone?
Comments
And they're screaming bloody murder in DNC land...
about the "Fake News" that HER sold uranium. Apparently it's cool, because it was legal and totally signed off on by tons of her buddies...
Scuse me if I'm wrong, but this is coming perilously close to "I can't have broken the law, because I wrote them!"
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
America --the land of the free
can now be officially retired. This is the actions of a police state. I don't think anyone can deny this. Even people who were just passing by it were arrested and charged for felony rioting. I'd like to know how many of the protesters were undercover police agitators? We know that the police put them into every protest going back decades or even much longer.
The prosecutors also said this about charging everyone who was in the vicinity of the protests.
You don’t personally have to be the one that breaks the window to be guilty of rioting.”
In the latter part of this article there is a description of the rules that the police broke for how they are supposed to treat protests and why they were put in place after DC had to pay millions in fines to people who were arrested in 2002. I recommend reading the whole article and follow links that describe what happened to people who were arrested back then.
it’s a police state mentality” — j20 and the racist origins of criminalizing protest
I'm surprised that this jury found the protesters not guilty. If they had ruled the other way it would have had dire consequences for us in the future. In my opinion.
Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.
The linked article you cited is eloquent
By organizing a collective decision to support the group, the prosecutors are overwhelmed, not only by personnel but financial limitations. Furthermore, such unpopular because unjust mass trials are bad publicity. Washington certainly has more than its share.
I recommend interested persons in mass arrest read the whole article.
We NEED these people to be found innocent.
Or else next time the cops could very well adopt the tactics the Ohio National Guard used at Kent State.
That may sound like hyperbole BUT look at how cops are dealing with the American public now. How many murders of unarmed or innocent people, many who are ‘guilty’ of nothing but being in the vicinity of a rogue cop, do we read about daily? Many cops (most cops?) are ex-military, taught to shoot first, with no thought or question as to whether it’s justified. Then they crawl like craven cowards behind the “I was afraid” excuse and walk. (We have a nation of trigger-happy gutless wonders patrolling our streets. And the so-called good ones cover or make excuses for the bad ones.)
IMO, it’s just a matter of time.
I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks
Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa
The cost of being tried in DC must
Be truly overwhelming to most of the accused.
A truth of the nuclear age/climate change: we can no longer have endless war and survive on this planet. Oh sh*t.