The Evening Blues - 12-26-18



eb1pt12


The day's news roundup + tonight's musical feature: The Olympics

Hey! Good Evening!

This evening's music features L.A. Doo Wop group The Olympics. Enjoy!

The Olympics - Big Boy Pete, The Slop

“People have only as much liberty as they have the intelligence to want and the courage to take.”

-- Emma Goldman


News and Opinion

Worth a full read to sort out who's been naughty and who's been nice:

Major Liberal Groups Sat on Sidelines as Senate Passed Historic Resolution on Yemen War

The Senate vote this month to end U.S. support for the war in Yemen marked a historic break from a bipartisan embrace of a pro-war foreign policy, yet it was accomplished without strong backing from Washington’s liberal foreign policy infrastructure. The resolution, co-sponsored by Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Chris Murphy, D-Conn., invokes the rights laid out in the War Powers Act of 1973 that assert Congress’s authority over war, and it was the result of many months of work by a coalition of progressive activists and anti-war lawmakers. ...

Backers of the effort approached the Center for American Progress, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the American Civil Liberties Union, and all declined to specifically endorse the resolution or become members of the activist coalition. And when a procedural vote on the resolution came to the House floor, it got the same kind of half-hearted support from Democratic leadership, falling just three votes short. As the momentum built toward the Senate victory, the lack of support from established groups in Washington became increasingly conspicuous. In the wake of the successful vote, the politics of war and peace in Washington are being reoriented, opening the possibility for a generational change that could have implications far beyond the Trump administration, potentially restraining the militaristic impulses of a future Democratic administration. ...

Before December 13, the Senate had never used its authority under the War Powers Resolution to force a president to end an ongoing war. ... The Senate’s passage of the resolution bestowed on it the kind of luster that allows liberal groups to support it without feeling as if they’re moving in too radical a direction. And, indeed, some insist that they’ve been strong supporters all along. Before the Senate vote, CAP, Amnesty International, and HRW put out statements condemning the war in Yemen and signaling broad backing of congressional action to end U.S military support in the country. There is no question that, to varying degrees, they’ve all been critical of Saudi Arabia. Yet none of them specifically endorsed the two parallel resolutions on the Yemen war making their way through Congress — when it came to using the War Powers Resolution as a vehicle to end the war, reluctance set in.

The issue is especially sensitive to the Center for American Progress, the most prominent Democratic think tank in Washington, because it has been criticized for accepting significant funding from the embassy of the UAE, one of the Gulf countries leading the war on Yemen. The UAE gave CAP between $500,000 to $999,000 in 2017, according to the organization’s website.


Bring the Troops Home, But Also Stop the Bombing

As our nation debates the merits of President Donald Trump's call for withdrawing U.S. troops from Syria and Afghanistan, absent from the debate is the more pernicious aspect of U.S. military involvement overseas: its air wars. Trump's announcement and General James Mattis' resignation should unleash a national discussion about U.S. involvement in overseas conflicts, but no evaluation can be meaningful without a clear understanding of the violence that U.S air wars have unleashed on the rest of the world for the past 17 years.

By our calculations, in this "war on terror," the U.S. and its allies have dropped a staggering 291,880 bombs and missiles on other countries — and that is just a minimum number of confirmed strikes. ...

We are heading into 2019 with new initiatives to reduce U.S. military involvement overseas. In Yemen, that initiative is the result of massive grassroots pressure on Congress, and is being done in opposition to Trump's continued support for Saudi aggression in Yemen. In the case of Syria and Afghanistan, it is coming from Trump himself, with broad popular support but bipartisan opposition from Congress and D.C. elites.

Those who are part of the bipartisan war consensus should reflect on the growing public awareness of the murderous futility of U.S. overseas wars. A survey by the Committee for a Responsible Foreign Policy revealed "a national voter population that is largely skeptical of the practicality or benefits of military intervention overseas." Donald Trump seems to realize this public disdain for endless war, but we shouldn't let him get away with reducing U.S. troop presence but continuing—and in some cases escalating—the devastating air wars.

Turkish forces will cross into Kurdish-held Syria – foreign minister

Turkey’s foreign minister has reiterated that Turkish forces are determined to cross the Euphrates river into Kurdish-held territory in Syria as soon as possible, despite previous suggestions from both Washington and Ankara that Turkey would delay the proposed military campaign.

Mevlut Cavusoglu told reporters at a briefing on Tuesday that “if Turkey says it will enter, it will”. While the foreign minister did not give a time frame, Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, said last week that Turkey would stall its offensive as part of coordination with the US over the planned withdrawal of US forces from the area. ...

Turkey will take over the remnants of the fight to remove Isis from its last slivers of territory and has the “strength to neutralise” Isis on its own, Cavusoglu said. The future of the international coalition remains unclear. The foreign minister also criticised the French president, Emmanuel Macron, who has said French forces will remain in Kurdish-held Syria as a buffer.

“If France is staying in Syria to protect the YPG, that will neither benefit France nor the YPG,” he said, referring to the main Kurdish militia in Syria, adding that Turkey would take its cues on the matter from Washington, rather than Paris. ...

It is widely believed the catalyst for the sudden detente is the death of the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul earlier this year. The US has sought to insulate its partners in Riyadh, including the Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, from blame in the case.

US Empire on the Ropes

Trump administration in question as political warfare in Washington intensifies

The year 2018 is coming to a close amidst a historic political crisis in the United States. In the past week, Washington has been convulsed by conflicts over Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw US troops from Syria and reduce troop levels in Afghanistan, and the ensuing resignation of Defense Secretary James Mattis. This has coincided with a sharp drop on the stock market and a partial government shutdown that could extend well into next year. It is not Trump’s fascistic attack on immigrants, his war on the working class or his belligerence toward China that has triggered paroxysms of rage within the state and from the Democratic Party. It is, rather, his seeming intention to wind down the wars in Syria and Afghanistan, both of which are undeclared and illegal.

The future of the administration is being called into question. Chuck Todd, the host of NBC’s “Meet the Press” program, said on Sunday that the resignation of Mattis in protest over the troop withdrawals could be the “beginning of the functional end of this presidency.” He cited the erosion of support for Trump among Senate Republicans, who have served as a buffer against the investigations, centered on the probe by former FBI Director Robert Mueller into Trump’s personal dealings and the Trump campaign’s alleged ties to Russia. In Trump’s foreign policy shifts, the Democrats, speaking for the military and intelligence apparatus, see an abandonment of what they consider to be a fundamental premise of American foreign policy: That control over the Middle East is critical in countering Russia, which in turn is necessary in order to confront China. Democratic Senator Chris Coons declared on CBS’s “Face the Nation” Sunday that “President Trump is handing a great big Christmas gift to Vladimir Putin in Russia and to the Ayatollah Khamenei of Iran.”

In the process, the Democrats are unashamedly aligning with the most reactionary forces within the state apparatus and the military. “Mad Dog” Mattis, the butcher of Fallujah, who once declared that “it’s fun to shoot some people,” has been transformed into a pillar of moral virtue. Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate, declared on “Meet the Press” that “it breaks my heart” to see Mattis leave. He said he begged Mattis to “stay, stay as long as you possibly can,” because “we desperately need your mature voice, your voice of patriotism.” The war criminal Mattis, still alive, is following the path to political sainthood the Democrats and the media previously laid for the deceased John McCain and George H.W. Bush. ...

The ferocious reaction against Trump’s moves in Syria and Afghanistan exposes the fraud of the “war on terror,” supposedly launched to combat Islamist terrorists. Trump justified his plan to withdraw US troops by pointing out that ISIS has been routed in Syria. But as scores of indignant opponents of the move have stated, the real issue is not ISIS, but rather the struggle against Washington’s geopolitical rivals in the Middle East and Central Asia, above all Russia and Iran. In fact, the events of September 11, 2001 were merely the pretext for the implementation of expansionist plans prepared long before, beginning with the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq under Bush, followed by the war against Libya and the CIA-backed civil war in Syria under Obama. The original rationale has largely been dropped and American foreign policy exposed for what it is—the effort to control the world through military force.

US Congress just recently alarmed with AP-Xinhua relationship… which started 40 yrs ago

Pilger Says Assange Denies Meeting Manafort

WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange has vehemently denied that he ever met Donald Trump’s former campaign manager, according to journalist and filmmaker John Pilger, who met with Assange at Ecuador’s embassy in London last week.

Pilger said Assange told him the story published by The Guardian on Nov. 27 was a “total fabrication.” Pilger told Consortium News in an interview for the Unity4J vigil on Friday that “I personally can confirm that did not happen. He said it was a fabrication. It was not possible. The way internal security works at that embassy, it was not possible.” Pilger called The Guardian story “an indication of a kind of degradation of the media today and especially of the ‘respectable’ media.

French “yellow vest” protesters mount pre-Christmas protest against Macron

On Saturday, tens of thousands of “yellow vest” protesters demonstrated in France, amid a growing strike wave in neighboring Spain and in Portugal, where protesters also donned yellow vests. Thousands of people joined protest marches in France’s major cities, or blockaded highway intersections and France’s borders with Spain, Italy or Germany, to express their opposition to Macron and the European Union (EU). According to the Interior Ministry, there were 2,000 “yellow vest” demonstrators in Paris, where protesters divided themselves between the Champs-Élysées and Montmartre, after having tricked police into thinking they were marching on Versailles. The authorities had preemptively shut down the Versailles Palace, next to which they stationed water cannons. In the provinces, according to official figures, thousands demonstrated in Bordeaux, Toulouse and Lille, while hundreds protested in Nantes, Marseille and Lyon.

As usual, the security forces reacted with violent repression. In Paris they arrested Eric Drouet, a truck driver who helped launch the “yellow vest” protests on Facebook, alleging that he had a “sort of nightstick.” Another widely circulated video showed a policeman drawing his pistol and taking aim at protesters after throwing stun grenades unprovoked at the protesters. The mobilization was a rebuke to Interior Minister Christophe Castaner, who last week declared that on the “yellow vest” protests, “It’s enough,” and ordered police to smash highway blockades. After more than a month of protests and violent police repression of demonstrators, however, the movement is still very widely popular. It has 70 percent support in the French public, and various polls say that between 54 and 62 percent of French people want the movement to continue.

Citing Interior Ministry figures—showing 40,000 protesters Saturday, well less than the 125,000 it announced after the first protest on November 17—the French media are all predicting the imminent end of the movement and a return to order. It remains to be seen whether the dip in participation figures reflects Interior Ministry manipulation, protesters taking a break for the Christmas holidays, or a more lasting move away from the “yellow vest” blockades and protest marches. What is clear, however, is that political opposition and social anger to the entire Macron government and French state machine are continuing to grow in the working class.

The political situation is becoming more explosive. The government has not satisfied a single one of the demands underlying the ‘yellow vest” protests: for social equality, large wage increases, raising taxes on the rich, Macron’s resignation and the end to police repression. ... On Tuesday, Prime Minister Edouard Philippe announced he was suspending all Macron’s concessions to the “yellow vests,” claiming they were too expensive. He flip-flopped a few hours later amid a wave of anger on social media. But these two 180-degree turns in the course of a few hours showed that the government’s promises deserve no confidence whatsoever.

Top Amazon boss privately advised US government on web portal worth billions to tech firm

A top Amazon executive privately advised the Trump administration on the launch of a new internet portal that is expected to generate billions of dollars for the technology company and give it a dominant role in how the US government buys everything from paper clips to office chairs. Emails seen by the Guardian show that the Amazon executive Anne Rung communicated with a top official at the General Services Administration (GSA) about the approach the government would take to create the new portal, even before the legislation that created it – known to its critics as the “Amazon amendment” – was signed into law late last year.

Amazon and the Trump administration appear to have an antagonistic relationship because of the president’s frequent Twitter attacks on the Amazon founder, Jeff Bezos, who also owns the Washington Post. But the behind-the-scenes lobbying by Amazon officials underscores how the company has quietly amassed an unrivalled position of power with the federal government.

The 2017 correspondence between Rung – a former official in the Obama administration credited with transforming the federal government’s procurement policies before she joined Amazon – and Mary Davie at the GSA, offers new insights into how Amazon has used key former government officials it now employs – directly and as consultants – to gain influence and potentially shape lucrative government contracts. It has not yet been determined which companies will build the US government’s new e-commerce portal, but Amazon is widely expected to take on a dominant role, giving it a major foothold in the $53bn market for federal procurement of commercial products.

Amazon is also the frontrunner to win a separate $10bn cloud computing contract with the Pentagon, known as Jedi, which will in effect move the defense department’s data on to a commercially run cloud computing system. Amazon already operates a cloud service for the US intelligence community, including a contract with the CIA, and has said it can protect even the most top secret data on a cloud that is walled off from the public internet. The company’s strength in its defense and intelligence business had largely been attributed to its hiring in 2011 of Steven Spano, a former brigadier general in the air force who has since left the company.

Richard Wolff: We Need a More Humane Economic System—Not One That Only Benefits the Rich

To See Who Stands With People Over Lobbyists, Progressive Campaign Pressures Democrats to Quickly Hold Vote on Medicare for All

With a deep-pocketed coalition of industry lobbyists, former Obama and Clinton campaign officials, and establishment Democrats already crafting their talking points and formulating their strategy to undercut Medicare for All, progressive advocacy groups are ramping up pressure on the incoming Democratic House to combat these corporate forces by quickly pushing ahead with single-payer legislation in the new Congress.

In a petition circulated this week, the grassroots advocacy group Progressive Change Campaign Commitee (PCCC) is calling on the new House Democratic majority to advance toward a vote on Medicare for All legislation as soon as possible. "Big corporation lobbyists are spending millions trying to override the will of the people and kill Medicare for All before the fight even starts. That's why it's imperative that Congress sees that Americans haven't forgotten about Medicare For All now that the election is over. This fight is just beginning," PCCC declared in an email to supporters.

"If Congress brings Medicare For All for a vote, we will see who stands with over 70 percent of Americans, and who stands with the lobbyists. Then we'll know who needs persuasion—and who needs a primary," the group continued. "Together, we'll deliver this message to House Democratic leadership so they know where the public stands."

View the full petition here.

Because—as PCCC put it—"Medicare for All doesn't have an army of corporate lobbyists," progressives are planning a massive grassroots mobilization in the coming months in an effort to overcome industry-funded lawmakers who are wedded to upholding America's deadly healthcare status quo.

In Defeat for Trump's Xenophobic Agenda, Supreme Court Rejects 'Immoral' Anti-Asylum Policy

In what immigrant rights groups celebrated as a significant victory over President Donald Trump's xenophobic agenda, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the White House cannot automatically deny asylum to those who don't enter the country through an "official" border crossing.

"The Trump administration can no longer discriminate against asylum-seekers based on how they entered the country," RAICES, the largest immigration legal services non-profit in Texas, wrote on Twitter. "This government's policy of clogging ports of entry and then punishing those who cross outside is immoral. We're glad it's beginning to crumble."

In its 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court upheld a lower court decision that blocked the Trump administration's asylum rule from taking effect. Conservative Justice John Roberts joined the court's four liberal justices in denying the Trump administration's plea to allow the policy to move forward, while Justice Brett Kavanaugh sided with the White House. ...

While noting that the legal battle over the Trump administration's policy is far from over, Bloomberg observed that "the high court rebuff of Trump's request to block the order suggests skepticism about the administration's legal case."

Carols at Tornillo: protesters sing for children held in Trump's tent city

Singing and chanting as loud as they could, a few hundred feet from where thousands of children remain detained in a tent-like facility, activists and members of the public hoped their voices would find their way across fences and barbed wire. They wanted to let the children know people were thinking of them during this holiday season.

El Paso organizations put together the Christmas Caroling event in Tornillo, which began on Sunday and will continue daily until 1 January. The idea came from Joshua Rubin, an activist from Brooklyn who has spent the past two months at the border, monitoring the treatment of migrants held by the federal government. Rubin first visited McAllen, Texas in the summer, when the Trump administration’s controversial family separation policy was in place. He came back in October, after learning about the expansion of the Tornillo facility.

“I decided to come down, sit here at the gates and watch what goes in and what goes out,” he said. “I gather what I see and report to people, and maybe if I’m here watching, the rest of the country might start watching and these kids won’t be forgotten.” As of last week, more than 2,700 minors remained in custody at the temporary facility next to the Tornillo-Guadalupe port of entry. The camp lies to the east, surrounded by pecan fields and empty lots, away from the eyes of the public.

The caroling attracted a strong contingent of locals. Supporters also came from New York, Ohio, Dallas, Houston, San Marcos and elsewhere. ... Attendees spoke about their dislike of Trump immigration policies, sang carols and chanted “No están solos” – “You’re not alone” – in an attempt to remind the migrant children they had a community behind them. ... Texas state senator José Rodriguez thanked everyone who showed up and encouraged them to keep up the pressure, to make sure the facility closes sooner rather than later. Both the children in the camp and the White House should know Donald Trump’s hardline policies do not represent the values of the country, he said.

The Texas “tent city” housing thousands of migrant kids is closing

The Texas tent city built in June to house migrant children is set to close in the coming weeks, according to officials who work for the contractor that runs the shelter. The contract between the Trump administration and BCFS, which operates the shelter in Tornillo, Texas, is set to expire Dec. 31, a BCFS official told the New York Times. By Jan. 15, the official said, all 2,500 children housed in the shelter should be heading to a parent or sponsor living within the United States. Until then, BCFS’s contract will be renewed daily.

Beto O’Rourke, a Texas Democratic congressman who fell short in his bid for a Senate seat earlier this year, said Sunday that the CEO of BCFS had told him that the shelter would no longer accept children. “He has more than 300 children who are ready to go,” O’Rourke told a crowd gathered outside the shelter to sing Christmas carols. “He said his only limitation right now is finding flights during the Christmas season.”

The Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the shelter, told VICE News in an email that there were no updates on its contract with the Tornillo shelter.

Donald Trump insists shutdown will not end unless Congress funds border wall

Donald Trump has marked Christmas Day by insisting the partial shutdown of the federal government will last until his demand for funds to build a wall on the US-Mexico border is met. The US government partially shut down on Saturday, and there is not yet any sign of tangible efforts to reopen agencies closed by a political impasse over Trump’s demand for border wall funds.

“I can’t tell you when the government is going to reopen,” Trump said, speaking after a Christmas Day video conference with US troops serving abroad. “I can tell you it’s not going to reopen until we have a wall, a fence, whatever they’d like to call it. I’ll call it whatever they want, but it’s all the same thing. It’s a barrier from people pouring into the country, from drugs.” He added: “If you don’t have that [the wall], then we’re just not opening.”

Funding for about a quarter of federal programs – including the departments of Homeland Security, Justice and Agriculture – expired at midnight on Friday. Without a deal to break the impasse, the shutdown is likely to stretch into the new year.

Trump’s latest comments come a day after top Democrats accused the president of “plunging the country into chaos” as top officials met to discuss a growing rout in stock markets caused in part by the president’s persistent attacks on the Federal Reserve and a government shutdown. ... Trump criticized the Federal Reserve on Monday, describing it as the “only problem” for the US economy, even as top officials convened the “plunge protection team” forged after the 1987 crash to discuss the growing rout in stock markets.

The crisis call on Monday between US financial regulators and the US treasury department failed to assure markets, and stocks fell again amid concern about slowing economic growth, the continuing government shutdown, and reports that Trump had discussed firing the Federal Reserve chairman, Jerome Powell.

8-Year-Old Guatemalan Boy Dies in Border Patrol Custody Days After High Court Rejects Asylum Ban

Second Guatemalan child dies after being detained by US border agents

An eight-year-old Guatemalan boy died in US government custody early on Christmas Day, immigration authorities said, marking the second death of an immigrant child this month after being detained at the border between Mexico and the United States. US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) said in a news release that the boy died in hospital shortly after midnight on Tuesday.

The boy showed “signs of potential illness” on Monday and was taken with his father to Gerald Champion regional medical center in Alamogordo, New Mexico, the agency said. Hospital staff diagnosed the child “with a common cold, and when evaluated for release, hospital staff found a fever”, the statement added.

Staff at the hospital held the boy for an additional 90 minutes, before releasing him in the afternoon with prescriptions for amoxicillin and Ibuprofen. Later that same evening, according to the agency statement, after suffering nausea and vomiting, the boy was readmitted to hospital where he died in the early hours of Tuesday morning.

The agency said the cause of the boy’s death has not been determined and that it has notified the Department of Homeland Security’s inspector general and the Guatemalan government. The hospital the Gerald Champion Regional Medical Center declined to comment, citing privacy regulations.



the evening greens


Greenland's Rapid Ice Melt Persists Even in Winter, Study Finds

In the latest troubling study regarding how the climate crisis is affecting the world's iciest regions, a new report by the Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS) found that the second-largest ice sheet in the world is currently melting even in winter. The study follows a report released earlier this month showing that Greenland's ice melt rate is currently faster than it's been in about 7,000 years. The island's 650,000 cubic miles of ice is melting 50 percent faster than it did in pre-industrial times.

"Greenland is a bit like a sleeping giant that is awakening," Edward Hanna, a climate scientist at the University of Lincoln, told Inside Climate News this week. "Who knows how it will respond to a couple of more degrees of warming? It could lose a lot of mass very quickly."

The ice sheet's persistent melting even in winter has come about because huge waves below the surface of the Atlantic Ocean, created by unusually strong winter winds, are pushing warm water up to Greenland—creating an environment that's hostile for the country's icy ecosystem, explains SAMS. These "coastally trapped internal waves" are "pushing warm water into the fjord and towards the glacier, causing melting hundreds of metres below the ocean surface," Dr. Neil Fraser, an ocean physicist who led the study, told the BBC.

Greenland's huge ice sheet also makes it a huge contributor to rising sea levels, SAMS noted, accounting for more than 20 percent of the annual increase in sea levels. Accelerating, year-round run-off that persists even in the coldest months of the year is "the greatest contributor to sea level rise," Sarah Das, a researcher at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, told Inside Climate News.

Record Rainfall Won't Save Us From Impending Water Shortages

Even in a world with more intense rain, communities could begin to run short of water. New research has confirmed that, in a warming world, extremes of drought have begun to diminish the world’s groundwater – and ever more intense rainstorms will do little to make up the loss in the global water supply. And a second, separate study delivers support for this seeming paradox: worldwide, there is evidence that rainfall patterns are, increasingly, being disturbed. The number of record-dry months has increased overall. And so has the number of record-breaking rainy months.

Both studies match predictions in a world of climate change driven by ever-higher ratios of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, from ever-increasing combustion of fossil fuels. But, unlike many climate studies, neither of these is based on computer simulation of predicted change. Each is instead based on the meticulous analysis of huge quantities of on-the-ground data. Together they provide substance to a 40-year-old prediction of climate change research: that in a warming world, those regions already wet will get ever more rain, while the drylands will tend to become increasingly more arid. ...

“This is something that has been missed. We expected rainfall to increase, since warmer air stores more moisture – and that is what climate models predicted too,” said Ashish Sharma, an environmental engineer at the University of New South Wales. “What we did not expect, despite all the extra rain everywhere in the world, is that the large rivers are drying out. We believe the cause is the drying of soils in our catchments. Where once these were moist before a storm event – allowing excess rainfall to run off into rivers – they are now drier and soak up more rain, so less water makes it as flow.”

Of all rainfall, only 36% gets into aquifers, streams and lakes. The remaining two thirds seeps into the soils, grasslands and woodlands. But more soil evaporation means less water is available from river supplies for cities and farms. ... “It’s a double whammy. Less water is ending up where we can’t store it for later use. At the same time, more rain is overwhelming drainage infrastructure in towns and cities, leading to more urban flooding,” said Professor Sharma.

'Deep Lack of Moral Clarity and Courage': Pelosi Accused of Moving to Kill Green New Deal Committee

In response to reports on Thursday that the Democratic leadership is taking steps to revive a defunct climate change panel, progressive groups and youth climate leaders warned that the move is an attempt by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and others to kill the surging demand for a Green New Deal Select Committee and called it a failure to fight for "solutions on the scale we need" to achieve "a livable future."

"Without a mandate to create a plan and a requirement that its members don't take fossil fuel money, we are deeply concerned that this committee will be just another of the many committees we've seen failing our generation our entire lives," Sunrise Movement co-founder Varshini Prakash declared after news broke that the Democratic leadership chose Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.) to lead the revived climate committee. As the Huffington Post reported, Green New Deal proponents were blindsided by the Democratic leadership's appointment of Castor, and it is unclear whether Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.)—who led the push for a Green New Deal Select Committee—will even get a seat on the climate panel.


They Rescued Pigs and Turkeys From Factory Farms — and Now Face Decades in Prison

In the Fall of 2017, Glenn Greenwald reported on a nationwide FBI manhunt for two pigs named Lily and Lizzie. The pigs had been removed from a factory farm in Utah by animal rights activists from a group called Direct Action Everywhere. From the perspective of the activists, the pigs were rescued. From the perspective of Smithfield Farms, the Chinese-owned multinational corporation that owns the factory farm, they were stolen. ...

Since Greenwald’s story was published, prosecutors in Utah have charged six DxE activists with multiple felonies, both for the Smithfield action and for a separate open rescue of turkeys at a Utah factory farm owned by Norbest. In Utah, stealing property worth less than $1,500 is generally a misdemeanor. But lawmakers have carved out an exception specifically for the benefit of the animal agriculture industry. If the property in question is an animal “raised for commercial purposes,” then no matter how little economic value that animal may have, the crime is a felony. Because of this exception, DxE activists are potentially facing decades in prison.


Also of Interest

Here are some articles of interest, some which defied fair-use abstraction.

Nothing unites our political class like the threat of ending our never-ending war

Send the Mad Dog to the Corporate Kennel

Reactions To Trump’s Syria Withdrawal Plan Say More Than The Plan Itself

Call from the Yellow Vests of Commercy Calling for Popular Assemblies

Message from Commercy: the time of the communes still rings out!

Political commentators see AMLO as a bigger threat than Bolsonaro

The IMF Is Dismantling Argentina All Over Again

Chris Hedges: Banishing Truth

Falling total fertility rate should be welcomed, population expert says

25 Ways the Canadian Health Care System Is Better Than Obamacare


A Little Night Music

The Olympics - Good Lovin'

The Olympics - Western Movies

The Olympics - The Hully Gully

Olympics - Dance By The Light Of The Moon, Dodge City

The Olympics - I Wish I Could Shimmy Like My Sister Kate

The Olympics - Peanut Butter

Olympics - Cool Short, Chicken

The Olympics - Secret Agents

The Olympics - Little Pedro

The Olympics - Dance With The Teacher

The Olympics - Well

The Olympics - Baby It's Hot


Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

OLinda's picture

Just want to point out that the first item under "Also of Interest" is a Matt Taibbi special. Greenwald calls in "spectacularly correct." I love his way with words.

Taibbi - Rolling Stone

Another article worth reading on the same subject:

Sullivan - NYMag

Get that? After 17 years, we’ve gotten nowhere, like every single occupier before us. But for that reason, we have to stay. These commanders have been singing this tune year after year for 17 years of occupation, and secretaries of Defense have kept agreeing with them. Trump gave them one last surge of troops — violating his own campaign promise — and we got nowhere one more time. It is getting close to insane.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

@OLinda

thanks for the link to sullivan's article, i agree that he's spot on. i thought that this part was especially good:

There comes a point when a president has to say no to the neo-imperial blob, to cut bait in wars that have become ends in themselves, generating the very problems they were launched to resolve. There is never a good time to do this. There wasn’t in Vietnam and there isn’t in Afghanistan and the Middle East. Sometimes, you just have to do it. I wish Obama had been able to. But he got trapped in agonizing rationalizations of the indefensible, paid too much respect to the architects of failure (not to speak of torture), and thereby failed after eight long years to fulfill his core campaign promise to disengage from these quagmires. Maybe it takes an impulsive, dangerous nutjob like Trump to finally do it, to end the wars the American people want to end. And that, I think, is less an indictment of him than of those who let this madness go on for so long.

up
0 users have voted.
janis b's picture

@OLinda

I’d say that almost every direction the country is taking is beyond insane, only I can’t think of a word that describes it more fully. Maybe ‘psychotic’, but I don’t think there’s a remedy for it that doesn’t involve some serious mind-altering, unlike the the ones we are subjected to by the media. The mind is very plastic, so we should all be capable of a change of thought if our intention is there. How to stimulate more positive intention is the secret. Providing every individual with a sense of purpose and security would help, but instead the resources are wasted on spending that promotes the opposite.

up
0 users have voted.
Raggedy Ann's picture

We survived the holiday! Drove to daughter’s and got home a couple hours ago. Good to be home!

How long will Herr Drumpf hold out? Will the lights flicker in the White House? Will Air Force One still fly? If he doesn’t suffer, we might as well cry uncle, now.

Snow expected this weekend. I hope it materializes.

Have a warm evening, everyone! Pleasantry

up
0 users have voted.

"The “jumpers” reminded us that one day we will all face only one choice and that is how we will die, not how we will live." Chris Hedges on 9/11

joe shikspack's picture

@Raggedy Ann

woohoo! glad to hear that you survived and prospered. Smile

i think trump is now more in danger than at any time in his presidency. he has committed the one unpardonable sin, trying to end an imperialist war before the owners were done escalating it.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

a function which was neither expected nor intended.

https://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/g-o-d-d-a-m-n-hamsters/

JPR site managers are working on a way to disable the feature (or, depending on how one looks at it, fix the “bug”).

up
0 users have voted.

@lotlizard

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10025133298

up
0 users have voted.
Pluto's Republic's picture

@lotlizard

Are there overlords there with whom the site has no contact?

up
0 users have voted.

____________________

The political system is what it is because the People are who they are. — Plato
lotlizard's picture

@Pluto's Republic  
and installed it without fully grasping what all exactly was in it — at least, that’s what it sounds like.

When it comes to such matters, few other websites are so fortunate as we are. Here, basically, JtC ♡ is Doctor Who.

up
0 users have voted.

@lotlizard
wordpress profanity filters are plugins, you download and install them.

https://www.wpexplorer.com/wordpress-profanity-spam-filters/

If a plugin is installed it can be uninstalled, AFAIK anyway.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

@lotlizard

heh, i wonder if it was russian hackers or hillary's hackers pretending to be russians. Smile

up
0 users have voted.
enhydra lutris's picture

@lotlizard

up
0 users have voted.

That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --

Shahryar's picture

I come here for the music, you know. I'm totally stumped on how to effect political change so, in the meantime, I'm just going to groove on sound.

up
0 users have voted.

@Shahryar

Hope you and Shahrazade have been well.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

@Shahryar @Shahryar

heh, i am pretty much stumped as to how to force the change that i see as necessary to happen, too. in the meantime, i figure that knowing what's going on and taking revenge (the best revenge is living well) by enjoying great music is a pretty good way to spend one's time. if i had to choose between those two, i'd take the music every time. Smile

happy holidays to you and shaz!

up
0 users have voted.
Azazello's picture

I've got some stuff tonight.
More on the Steele Dossier, from The Hill: The Steele Dossier and the perils of political insurance policies
This is very good, on farm labor in CA: In the Valley of Fear
And Michael Tracey: Notes On The Withdrawals

up
0 users have voted.

We wanted decent healthcare, a living wage and free college.
The Democrats gave us Biden and war instead.

snoopydawg's picture

@Azazello

Later, confronted with the evidence, Clinton and her campaign finally admitted that the dossier was a campaign-funded document that was pushed by Steele and others to the media.

That she had her longtime friend Bluementhal contact Steele for who he should contact in Russia for some 'dirt' on her opponent and then get the FBI to spy on him and people in his campaign has got to be skirting campaign laws. Correct the Record also was borderline campaign finance fraud. Laundering $84 million in campaign donations is definitely fraud.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

joe shikspack's picture

@Azazello

thanks for the links! turley does a great job of spotting the corruption beneath russiagate and the fact that the clintonistas are in it up to their necks. tracey's analysis is pretty spot on and the immigrant agriculture piece is quite interesting.

i'll include all the links in tomorrow's eb.

up
0 users have voted.
Azazello's picture

@joe shikspack
We just saw Fahrenheit 11/9, decent flick, switching gears now to watch the Amy Winehouse movie. Happy St. Stephens' Day, joe.

up
0 users have voted.

We wanted decent healthcare, a living wage and free college.
The Democrats gave us Biden and war instead.

joe shikspack's picture

@Azazello

did somebody say st stephen? Smile

up
0 users have voted.

Congress's authority over war. Rather, it purports to create Presidential power over war and, in so doing, I believe the Act is unconstitutional. When matters like that have gone to the Supremes after a long time, however, the Supreme Court has tended to wimp out.

As we all know, Article I of the Constitution of the United States lists the powers of Congress.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 provides:

[The Congress shall have Power...] To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

How could any grant of power in the War Powers Act be any stronger than a grant of power in the US Constitution, which is the Supreme Law of the land, superior to any and all state and federal statutes?

The Constitution also provides that the President is the Commander in Chief of US armed forces. However, the Constitution does not empower one person to commit US blood and treasure to war. Only Congress has that power and, IMO, for very good reason.

What if the CIC ends a war before Congress wants? Congress can declare war again. However, I cannot imagine either the CIC or the Congress risking a Constitutional crisis in that manner, not to mention failing to present a unified front to the enemy du jour.

What if Congress wants the war to end, but the big fool says to push on? Easy peasy. Congress uses its Article I power of the purse to cut off funding. https://www.nytimes.com/1973/06/15/archives/sweeping-cutoff-of-funds-for... And that happened in 1973, the same year that Congress enacted the War Powers resolution. There also had been a 1969 cut off as to Laos and maybe Cambodia.

No, the War Powers Resolution did not give Congress a single power over war that the Constitution had not already given Congress. What the War Powers Resolution actually did was to delegate to the President some of the power over war that the Constitution had vouchsafed only to Congress. Among other things, the Resolution tacitly authorizes a President to start a war without a Congressional vote. IMO, that was unconstitutional delegation of power. So, please ignore claims that the Resolution checked the President's power. The Constitution did that.

The War Powers Resolution (also known as the War Powers Resolution of 1973 or the War Powers Act) (50 U.S.C. 1541–1548)[1] is a federal law intended to check the president's power to commit the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of the U.S. Congress. The Resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution. It provides that the U.S. President can send U.S. Armed Forces into action abroad only by declaration of war by Congress, "statutory authorization," or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."

The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30-day withdrawal period, without a Congressional authorization for use of military force (AUMF) or a declaration of war by the United States. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of each of the House and Senate, overriding the veto of the bill from President Nixon.

It has been alleged that the War Powers Resolution has been violated in the past – for example, by President Bill Clinton in 1999, during the bombing campaign in Kosovo. Congress has disapproved all such incidents, but none has resulted in any successful legal actions being taken against the president for alleged violations.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution

Isn't it odd that, although Jack Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson escalated in Vietnam, especially Johnson, Democratic Congresses felt no need for a War Powers Resolution until a Republican was CIC?

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

@HenryAWallace

your observations about the war powers act are spot on. my sense of the war powers act was that it was created not so much to grant the executive additional powers (beyond which it had already arrogated to itself) as to give the (bipartisan) war party in congress a chance to test-drive new wars started by the president to see if they wished to be held accountable by the electorate.

with the end of the draft, congress came to the realization that the public response to wars was considerably less visceral and the (bipartisan) war party was loathe to rein in the executive for any hostilities that it felt like engaging in.

up
0 users have voted.

@joe shikspack

Your thoughts about motive are very similar to mine. However, I keep mine to myself lest some genius attempt to discredit my entire post with "conspiracy theory" or some variation thereof.

At least by the time it got to Johnson, Americans responded to the "Vietnam Era" as they had to none before it. And the 1968 Democratic National Convention had to have boggled the minds of party bosses who had agreed on Adlai Stevenson at the 1952 DNC after Estes Kefauver had won every primary he entered. Democratic party bosses were still picking the nominee in 1968: Humphrey had not even entered a single Democratic primary. (But look what happened to the guy who did.)

up
0 users have voted.
Pluto's Republic's picture

@HenryAWallace

I agree with your position.

It make me wonder, though. If congress declares a war (say on Russia, the way they imposed sanctions on Russia) and the President refused to command the military to wage war, then there would be no war. Is that part of the original plan?

up
0 users have voted.

____________________

The political system is what it is because the People are who they are. — Plato
Azazello's picture

Well, not new really, it's from Saturday's live chat but just dropped today: Hilary Pushes For More War In Syria
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIGPfKfjlmQ width:500 height:300]

up
0 users have voted.

We wanted decent healthcare, a living wage and free college.
The Democrats gave us Biden and war instead.

snoopydawg's picture

@Azazello

Instead of writing policies for giving our enemies money, and weapons. Why? He gave his mistress classified information so that she could write a book. Was he charged under the espionage act like Chelsea Manning or John Kireakou or any of the other 6 people Obama charged under it? Nope. He was fined $100,000. Dropped a rank and put on probation for two years.

The intercept has an article on Reality Winner written by her mom who wants to know why Reality wasn't given bail because she had $30,00 in her bank account. But Manafort and Flynn had much, much more and yet they were released on bail.

Here's our two Americas that Edwards spoke about.

Sumner today rehashed Russia Gate and all of the inaccuracies that have been debunked and linked to the guardian article about Manafort meeting with Assange. Guess how many people called him out on this? Yup. 0. Every one else just nodded their heads and piled on. Hillary wasn't the only one who wanted an insurance policy in for the election. Obama was also going to use it in case Trump lost but didn't accept the results. Obama was going to pull the Steele dossier out and ... sorry, I've forgotten the ending, but I'm looking for the article on it.

9/11 Gate is just like Russia Gate. The gift that keeps on giving.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

@Azazello

contact Hillary at youcouldhavehadme.com, the url she gave on the premiere episode of the sad attempt to resuscitate the Murphy Brown series. And then there was "Hillary Clinton calls for U.S. to bomb Syrian air fields," which Trump did not long afterward. As warmongers go, Hillary is unparalleled, IMO. Not to mention she is the only one who laughs about bombing people or having them killed. Hillary appalls even Lady MacBeth

It was the first and last episode I watched, but I'm glad not to have missed out on additional evidence of Hillary's boundless cluelessness. (And, in this case, perhaps Diane English's as well)

BTW, Bergen and her daughter took advantage of the Clintons' using the Lincoln bedroom of the White House to raise donations. If nothing else, the Clintons are shameless grifters.

up
0 users have voted.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

@gjohnsit

thanks for the tune!

up
0 users have voted.
janis b's picture

Thanks joe, for your steadfast contribution of news and blues. Because The Olympics are so cool to watch I looked for other live performances. Either there are no other recordings or they’re not available.

Here's a substitute ...

[video:https://youtu.be/FBvdO5Z_uoo]

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

@janis b

results for the olympics are really hard to filter because of the popularity of the name for other things. i wasn't able to find much in the way of the original group in live performance. it's too bad, they were a great group.

there is at least one, perhaps more videos of a non-original members group calling itself the olympics out there.

anyway, thanks for the video!

up
0 users have voted.
Azazello's picture

Arizonan Jerry Riopelle has passed on.

Throw the dog out,
Put the Stones on.
Let's get loaded like we used to do.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlYbSXeU8Bs width:500 height:300]>

up
0 users have voted.

We wanted decent healthcare, a living wage and free college.
The Democrats gave us Biden and war instead.