We must NEVER re-live the 2015-2016 primary

Submitted by HenryAWallace on Fri, 04/07/2017 - 6:29pm

unless we should.

Remember playing Which Hillary during the primary?

How about pointing out that the list of job titles on Her resume did not qualify her to be President because she had done poorly in each of those job titles?

Or pointing out that she "weathervaned?"

Or that she never met a war or surge she didn't like?

Wowza! Was the left ever wrong about all that!

Nope. It never was. The left had Her number all along. (You're welcome, America.)

Hillary March 27, 2011 (Assad a potential reformer)

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WztY-BFMMSc]

Hillary, less than five months later, on August 18, 2011: (Assad must go!)

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJ_QulWKdz0]

Hillary April 6, 2017 (Take out Syrian airfields.)
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/06/politics/hillary-clinton-syria-assad/
(Her had also urged Obama to take military action.)

Hours later....

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhjKBUlNHro]

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckwyVcNidCs]

Evil and The Lesser Evil--both deplorable!*

*Lucky you, you get to decide which is Evil and which is The Lesser Evil.

(I will be back later or tomorrow. I apologize!)

Tags:

Hillary Assad Syria

Vote

Comments

Submitted by dkmich on Fri, 04/07/2017 - 7:54pm

We need to forget the past and unify against Trump....

bleh... Nothing is going to change.

—

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

Submitted by HenryAWallace on Sat, 04/08/2017 - 7:25am

My pessimistic side fears you are correct, while my

@dkmich

optimistic side refuses to give up.

Submitted by Alligator Ed on Fri, 04/07/2017 - 10:25pm

Henry, a gentle reminder--the primary was in 2016

but we are still reaping the benefits.

Submitted by Ellen North on Sat, 04/08/2017 - 12:02am

@Alligator Ed

@Alligator Ed

And some of us are apparently still racist, sexist Bernie-Bros, also meaning that my clothes still don't fit...

—

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

Submitted by HenryAWallace on Sun, 04/09/2017 - 10:12am

Don't even try to act like Her feminists did not

@Ellen North

acknowledge Bernie's female supporters!

Here we have the U.S.A.'s first female Secretary of State, Madelyn Albright, who supposedly owes that title to Her, promising something special to women who vote for Bernie in the primary instead of for Hillary.

(Note Her reaction: Her patented, mindless bobblehead-nodding as Albright speaks, then, laughing and applauding Albright's sexist remark. Yet, Albright was the only one who apologized for sexism around that remark. Why? Also, note the position of Her hands and the hands of the other Stepfords listening to Albright. I can't believe that is coincidence. Also, why can't any politician speak without a bunch of people standing behind him, her or them? They often coordinate their outfits, too. Geebus, but these people are such transparently fake weirdos. Why on earth have we let them run our lives?)

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRimyfmz0MA]

And continuing with the "I'm with Her and sorry that I'm such a sexist female " apology tour is one of the early disciples of Betty Friedan, who also found a way to profit from feminism.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gr1qLVSOe7c]

Connie Francis, whose career ended because being raped left her too traumatized to continue, adding to Steinem's already massive tone deafness.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MqL8NZfax0]

IMO, Hillary is a Hillaryist, not a feminist. So, I always secretly wondered: In private, did anyone in Her crowd refer to Bernie's supporters collectively as Bernie bros and ho's? I would bet the deed to my home that at least some of them did. I never articulated that before. However, I hope it's okay to disclose that now that Hillary won the Democratic primary (snort) "fair and square," and the General is also over.

Of course, the left had, for eight years, said Her would lose the General, if Her ever got the nom. So, the left was correct about that, as well. Maybe someone besides the left should start actually paying attention to the left, instead of feinting at listening to the left?

Submitted by Ellen North on Sat, 04/08/2017 - 4:58pm

@HenryAWallace

@HenryAWallace

ROFLMAO - yet another great post!

Lol, that 'Hell is for women who don't help each other' comment seems to be the usual projection; after all, Hillary creates hell for anyone - especially women - who cannot/will not help Her, that being why the Clintons preferentially attack the Useless Eater Poors who have nothing to give Her but the votes Her is owed.

So of course the Clintons cut the social safety net, eliminating the welfare of the poorest and most desperate as Her knows it, these often being impoverished single mothers; promoted the (profitable!) mass imprisoning - and all-too-often effectively convict slave labour use - of, typically, the poorest, in the US many of these being People of Colour and both readily stereotyped and identifiable; continued to sell cluster bombs killing the poor in other countries, generally women and their children, who could do nothing for Her, although the arms manufacturers certainly could, while the delicious irony of their blowing the arms off these Poors would be so spit-ually nourishing for Her; doesn't think that a living wage or public health-care is desirable for the Poors, as they're only required to vote for Her and can then eat shit sandwiches and die, lacking the funds to be a Big Donor, eat or live a healthy life under a (non-repossessed) roof...

Her made pots of money from doing this, turning hell for the Poors into a revenue stream. So of course this has to be turned back upon the non-billionaire-Poor public, if they fail to vote for their own special places in Her exceptional hell.

Initially I thought the back-ground Stepfords in your second posted video might be stopping themselves from clapping a hand over Her mouth to keep the Corn Crake croak from coming out, (the temptation must have been severe) but then I realized that this was a show of solidarity, in taking the same hand position as Her, wherein passed bucks could be readily kept concealed after handshakes with banksters and other corporate interests.

I believe that Hillary has a special, custom-made feinting couch for training all of her lackeys/trolls. They have to supply their own pearls, though.

And I'll bet that Homeland (In)Security is making special electoral running shoes for Her as we speak, so Her can take Her Turn for the country's worst, next Presidential Selection. When Her taps her heels 3 times, anyone daring to compete with Her for the Presidency drops through a trap-door directly into Gitmo.

Who says Her can't eventually learn from at least some of Her mistakes?

#2.1 acknowledge Bernie's female supporters! Here we have the U.S.A.'s first female Secretary of State, Madelyn Albright, who supposedly owes that title to Her, promising something special to women who vote for Bernie in the primary instead of for Hillary. (Note Her reaction: Her patented, mindless bobblehead-nodding as Albright speaks, then, laughing and applauding Albright's sexist remark. Yet, Albright was the only one who apologized for sexism around that remark. Why? Also, note the position of Her hands and the hands of the other Stepfords listening to Albright. I can't believe that is coincidence. Also, why can't any politician speak without a bunch of people standing behind him, her or them? They often coordinate their outfits, too. Geebus, but these people are such transparently fake weirdos. Why on earth have we let them run our lives?) [video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRimyfmz0MA] And continuing with the "I'm with Her and sorry that I'm such a sexist female " apology tour is one of the early disciples of Betty Friedan, who also found a way to profit from feminism. [video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gr1qLVSOe7c] Connie Francis, whose career ended because being raped left her too traumatized to continue, adding to Steinem's already massive tone deafness. [video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MqL8NZfax0] IMO, Hillary is a Hillaryist, not a feminist. So, I always secretly wondered: In private, did anyone in Her crowd refer to Bernie's supporters collectively as Bernie bros and ho's? I would bet the deed to my home that at least some of them did. I never articulated that before. However, I hope it's okay to disclose that now that Hillary won the Democratic primary (snort) "fair and square," and the General is also over. Of course, the left had, for eight years, said Her would lose the General, if Her ever got the nom. So, the left was correct about that, as well. Maybe someone besides the left should start actually paying attention to the left, instead of feinting at listening to the left?

—

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

Submitted by HenryAWallace on Sun, 04/09/2017 - 9:45am

Thank you so much for your kind words!

@Ellen North

Yes, I think the similar hand positions were intended to give us the subliminal message that the whole group was aligned with Her. Just like the color of a politician's tie is supposed to send us a subliminal message.

#2.1.1

ROFLMAO - yet another great post!

Lol, that 'Hell is for women who don't help each other' comment seems to be the usual projection; after all, Hillary creates hell for anyone - especially women - who cannot/will not help Her, that being why the Clintons preferentially attack the Useless Eater Poors who have nothing to give Her but the votes Her is owed.

So of course the Clintons cut the social safety net, eliminating the welfare of the poorest and most desperate as Her knows it, these often being impoverished single mothers; promoted the (profitable!) mass imprisoning - and all-too-often effectively convict slave labour use - of, typically, the poorest, in the US many of these being People of Colour and both readily stereotyped and identifiable; continued to sell cluster bombs killing the poor in other countries, generally women and their children, who could do nothing for Her, although the arms manufacturers certainly could, while the delicious irony of their blowing the arms off these Poors would be so spit-ually nourishing for Her; doesn't think that a living wage or public health-care is desirable for the Poors, as they're only required to vote for Her and can then eat shit sandwiches and die, lacking the funds to be a Big Donor, eat or live a healthy life under a (non-repossessed) roof...

Her made pots of money from doing this, turning hell for the Poors into a revenue stream. So of course this has to be turned back upon the non-billionaire-Poor public, if they fail to vote for their own special places in Her exceptional hell.

Initially I thought the back-ground Stepfords in your second posted video might be stopping themselves from clapping a hand over Her mouth to keep the Corn Crake croak from coming out, (the temptation must have been severe) but then I realized that this was a show of solidarity, in taking the same hand position as Her, wherein passed bucks could be readily kept concealed after handshakes with banksters and other corporate interests.

I believe that Hillary has a special, custom-made feinting couch for training all of her lackeys/trolls. They have to supply their own pearls, though.

And I'll bet that Homeland (In)Security is making special electoral running shoes for Her as we speak, so Her can take Her Turn for the country's worst, next Presidential Selection. When Her taps her heels 3 times, anyone daring to compete with Her for the Presidency drops through a trap-door directly into Gitmo.

Who says Her can't eventually learn from at least some of Her mistakes?

Submitted by Ellen North on Mon, 04/10/2017 - 1:19pm

@HenryAWallace

@HenryAWallace

Hey, thanks, I finally got the subliminal message you just pointed out regarding the colour of politician's neck-ties! Even if we can't afford to buy the politicians in question, and the message amounts to 'suck on it', perhaps we can drag them off the political stage by those neckties in order to put them on that isolated luxurious island resort which some brilliant person posting here was suggesting that they be restricted to?

I do really like that idea and would like to see it implemented...

—

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

Submitted by HenryAWallace on Tue, 04/11/2017 - 1:09pm

I was so gung ho for Obama. I had been up so early to vote

@Ellen North

on election day that I fell asleep. I woke up just as they were announcing that Obama was about to make his victory speech. I cried. Next, I saw the entire family dressed in coordinating red and black.

That is when I had my first premonition that we were flocked again, but, as usual, I made excuses and shook it off.

I wonder what these ties are trying to convey to us?

Submitted by HenryAWallace on Sat, 04/08/2017 - 7:28am

Hi, Alligator Ed. Either that was so gentle that it

@Alligator Ed

sailed over my head or I am not fully awake yet. IOW, I am not getting your meaning. Would you help me out, please?

Submitted by edg on Sat, 04/08/2017 - 12:11pm

Title

@HenryAWallace

Your title says 2017 primary but the primary was last year, in 2016.

Submitted by HenryAWallace on Sun, 04/09/2017 - 9:46am

Derp. Thanks. Fixed.

@edg

Submitted by PhilK on Sat, 04/08/2017 - 8:10am

Minor issue about wording

the list of job titles on Her resume was not relevant because she had not done a good job in any of those titles

I would suggest that "the list of job titles on Her resume was not a reason to vote for her because she had not done a good job in any of those titles."

The hideous psychopathic war-mongering that she displayed in each of these offices is extremely relevant. It's why I voted for Jill Stein. It's why I would have voted for Trump if I lived in a state that Clinton had even a microscopic chance of winning.

Submitted by HenryAWallace on Sat, 04/08/2017 - 8:43am

Thanks, Phil! Coincidentally, I came back to the thread to

@PhilK

re-word that very bit and did so just before I saw your post.

Did you by any chance send me a pychic message while you posted? j/k

Although the wording I used before seeing yours is somewhat different, I think you and I both had the same kind of objection to my original wording.

I also added some to the OP. I posted it yesterday while in a bit of a hurry.

Fortunately or unfortunately for me, I have never had to make a difficult decision at the polls. I have always lived in states where my vote didn't matter. I honestly can't say how brave I would be if I thought my vote might matter because I've never been tested. Bottom line, though: our 1.2 Party system is horrid.